Lasting Legacy

FBStudents of Ba Methodist High School, villagers of Nailaga and nearby areas will now have access to the internet free of charge.

This comes after Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama opened the new telecentre at Ba Methodist High School today.

Comment:
This and other access centres where the government has made the internet accessible to students will prove to be Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama’s most enduring legacy. No other Prime Minister or politician in Fiji has had the foresight to do this.

Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama by his actions has made the libraries and research of the world available to all the students.

It is to be hoped that the gaming facilites will be blocked by the centres, not only for the students, but the people using them after school hours.

Can the numbers Balance?

Fat Dave-Pflieger-s2Outgoing Managing Director and CEO of Air Pacific Dave Pflieger said he cannot reveal the loan repayment agreement and details on the interest rates in relation to the loan taken from European banks to pay for the purchase of the three new A330s.

When asked in a conference, Pflieger said while many are raising issues about the loans, he said it is an amazing business plan to purchase the brand new planes to invest in the country.

The catalogue price for the new planes is US$200 million each and as revealed in 2011, the Fiji National Provident Fund gave Air Pacific a loan of $200 million which was the initial funding for the purchase of the three wide body planes. 

85 percent of the loan to purchase the planes has come from offshore banks.

When asked on the repayment plan on the huge loan, Pflieger said Air Pacific which will soon be Fiji Airways is now doing well financially and he expects it to deliver profits to pay off the loans.

Air Pacific, in which the Fiji public have a 51% interest, and the Fiji Provident Fund Members have a huge investment has not produced an annual report with a full set of audited accounts for the public to view since Fast Talking High Flying Dave was appointed to run our Airline, so why would he divulge anything now.

Perhaps the Chairman of Air Pacific who is a qualified and reputable accountant, should be asked to explain. 

The question is, how bad is it really and how long can the government of the day keep the truth hidden ?

When Anthony Gates ?

GatesThe Chief Justice Anthony Gates said he believes there will be a full set of rights in Fiji in time but he says people who are calling for judges and magistrates to resign should know that the courts need to remain open to hear cases. . 

Chief Justice Gates made the comments after recent criticisms from the International Bar Association.

While speaking in a mediation workshop, he stressed that it is important to carry out the important work of the judiciary and they should not have to walk away just because of criticisms from some organizations.

We ask when will that be Anthony Gates?, after all the current Fiji Pensioners are dead and buried; is that when their case will be heard in the Fiji courts ?

By “Full set of rights” do you mean Basic Civil Rights and the right to be heard by a fully independent and totally impartial judiciary?

It is easy for you to talk the talk now, but posterity and your peers will surely judge you for what you failed to do, which will be infamous , unlike your Chandrika Prasad ruling made in a fully independent impartial court.

The path to infamy is a very slippery slope indeed, and unfortunately it appears you could be heading that way. Only time will tell…

Fiji political parties appeal dismissal wrong: ICJ

john dowd

A prominent Australian legal figure says the dismissal of an appeal against Fiji’s political parties decree was legally wrong.

The appeal by Fiji’s political parties against the decree was thrown out by Justice Anjala Wati on the basis such decrees cannot be challenged in the courts.

John Dowd QC, president of the Australian branch of the International Commission of Jurists, has told Radio Australia’sPacific Beat the courts in Fiji are independent and should not allow their role to be undermined by the coup-installed military government.

“The judge should have found that the decree was invalid and that she could therefore deal with the matter,” he said.

“Jurisdiction remains independent and any independent judge, in my view, could not have come to this decision.”

Fiji’s Administration of Justice Decree states, among other provisions, that no court has jurisdiction to hear any challenges or applications for judicial review of decrees made by the President.

Mr Dowd says Fiji’s “undemocratic regime” cannot displace Fiji’s constitution and has purported to exercise a power they don’t have.

“This law, even if you accept that the regime is entitled to pass laws, cannot remove the judiciary’s power to deal with matters independently,” he said.

Mr Dowd says Fiji’s claim other countries around the world behave in a similar manner is “absolute nonsense”.

“Normal countries don’t do this,” he said. “In countries right throughout the world we have the judiciary independent of the government.”

“Once the executive takes over the judicial role, there’s no administration of justice at all.”

Mr Dowd says Fiji’s judges need to look very closely at how independent they can be in their jobs as judges.

“If they’re not, then they have to look at whether they should be judges at all,” he said.

A simple fact is, that if the Court had approved this appeal, the way would then be open for the decree that deprived Fiji Pensioners of their civil rights and the right to obtain redress through the courts for the loss of their pensions, to be overturned.

The question must be asked, “Who is really guilty of scandalizing the judiciary” ? 

 

Could this be Us ?

“A society that robs an individual of the product of his effort, or enslaves him, or attempts to limit the freedom of his mind, or compels him to act against his own rational judgment … is not, strictly speaking, a society, but a mob held together by institutionalized gang-rule.”

–author and philosopher Ayn Rand (1905-1982)

The publics right to information

Prof WNComputerization 20 years forward, information 30 years backward

Islands Business, 15 March 2013.

By Professor Wadan Narsey
The public readily engage in a heated debate on politics, while ignoring changes silently taking place in something as mundane as the “public availability of information”. Yet the latter can be far more important for our people’s welfare than exciting politics.
In every Pacific country, computerization (both hardware and software) has charged ahead over the last two decades. Computer prices have plummeted; processing power and storage capacity has increased a billion times; a small lap-top is the equivalent of a roomful of computers forty years ago; there are amazing software applications; and the Internet and mobile revolutions give access to the world’s libraries and information.
Word-processing allows reports to be written, corrected, formatted, spell-checked and printed.
Spread-sheets, with more than a million rows and 16 thousand columns of data, make complex mathematical, financial, logical and graphical functions, so easy, menu driven, requiring just a few clicks.
Database software allows for the easy menu-driven processing of massive amounts of data, once the domain only of bureaus of statistics and armies of statisticians who had to write complex programs.
All this “firepower” is available for the price of a good TV set or a gold necklace or a holiday abroad.
 
So why is it that for most government departments,

(a) the real information provided has gone backward s– in some cases by more than 30 years?

(b) their websites are colourful and glossy, but provide very little real information?

(c) already printed public information, is not provided through websites in a ready-to-use form?

The Fiji examples I give here (some bad and some good) are relevant for other PICs as well, as also may be an initiative I suggest.
 
Ministry of Labour

A few years ago, as part of my ECREA study on Just Wages for Fiji, I read through 40 years of Annual Reports by the Ministry of Labour. I was dismayed by one unexpected aspect – the massive deterioration over the four decades of real information provided.
  In the (colonial) sixties and post-independence seventies, the Ministry of Labour (and most Government ministries) did not have access to their own computers for analyzing data, tabulating or report writing.
  Data was analyzed using calculators, while Annual Reports were typed on manual typewriters, by “typists” (remember that extinct species?).
  Yet those early Annual Reports were full of useful comprehensive data and analysis.  
  Not any more. Have a look at recent Ministry of Labour Reports (they are all available in the Fiji National University Library).
  The actual production of most government Annual Reports are now outsourced to private companies, who take whatever data and text they are given by the Ministry, and turn out beautiful glossy reports.
  They are full of strategic plans, visions, missions, philosophies, etc., but devoid of any real information, which the public really need  to understand what is happening in that area, or to assess the ministry’s work by their Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  Like all government departments, Labour also has a glossy website, full of corporate plans, press releases, speeches and photos of Ministers, and wonderful enunciations of “spiritual values”.
But this website contains little useful information pertaining to the terms and conditions of work actually done by Fiji’s employees which is what the Ministry of Labor should be concerned about.
The last Annual Labour Report on their website is for 2007 (five years ago), and even that, astonishingly, gives you just the front cover!
  Yet the Ministry of Labour (and all its branches throughout Fiji) is full of computers, software and data, all available for analysis.
  It has dozens of staff with degrees, diplomas and certificates, which should enable them to analyze the data and present solid analytical useful reports for the stakeholders. Yet they don’t.  Their regional data is not even collated centrally despite their usefulness.
Does this Ministry of Labour think that taxpayers who pay their salaries, are not entitled to such relevant information? This is certainly not what I would expect from the current Minister, a former CEO of TPAF and a good USP graduate.
  Researchers could do a PhD analyzing the “empty” KPIs in the Ministry of Labour’s Corporate Plans.
  They are a typical example of “managerial revolutions” that nearly all Fiji’s government departments have been taken through in the last two decades (often by donors), converting genuinely productive technical people into paper shuffling and meeting-attending “managers”, of this and that.
 
Many other such departments

Have a look at the Department of Police, which also does not put on its website any real time series information on crimes, suicides etc., although press releases often selectively quote some statistic or two.
  The data is all there of course, within the Department, but sitting on someone’s desk or computer.
  Even when requested (as I recently did for information on suicides and attempted suicides in 2010 and 2011), why do those in power refuse to give the data to the public, let alone make it freely available to anyone who wants it, on their website? The frequent response is: Sir, what do you want it for? I will have to ask my superiors.  I will call you back. (They never do.)
Are decisions being consciously made by those in power, to deny the public the relevant data, in case it throws their performance in a bad light?
  Or are they simply unaware that giving the public all relevant data (that does not divulge individual information) is a necessary condition for their government to claim to be open, transparent and accountable to the tax-payers?
There could be several PhD theses, examining the websites of all government departments, for their usefulness, transparency and accountability, given the information that they all have or should have, that the public should be made aware of.
 
The Fiji National Provident Fund

The Fiji National Provident Fund is another sad example of a public organization which has gone backwards as a provider of data and useful information. This regression has even more serious implications for public welfare, given the centrality of FNPF to Fiji people’s lives and economy.
  Once upon a time, the FNPF Annual Reports and website used to have numerous useful data series on the operations of the FNPF – its membership profile, contributions, investments, earnings, etc.
  It is dismaying that most of this information has now been removed from the FNPF website and most are not even available in their Annual Reports.
  Why has the FNPF removed all this information from their website, in a period when massive restructuring of pensions and fund investment is taking place, with major implications for the welfare of FNPF contributors and pensioners?
  Was it a decision by the Board or the management? Or both, given how their functions have been astonishingly merged in recent years? (another PhD).
  This trend of deliberate reduction of information for the public, suggests that the FNPF is being very frugal with the truth when it claims to be transparent and accountable to their members. Continue reading