DOME/MAGNA HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED BY ASX quotation since October first, twenty twenty-six, under Listing Rule seventeen point five for failing to lodge its annual report on time. The underlying reason is that Dome can’t currently finish its audit for the year ended June thirtieth. Dome/Magma were asked repeatedly by Government officials to release a digital copy of the EIA, But they refused. Which explains why you can see from the Facebook posts less than 40 people actually read the document under the archaic rules that apply.

As of its October thirtieth quarterly report, the suspension was still in place, with the AGM pushed to November twenty-sixth. Magma itself isn’t a separate ASX-listed company anymore — Dome acquired Magma Mines, which held the Sigatoka project, back in twenty twenty-one. So there’s no Magma code to suspend; it’s all folded into DME. One thing worth watching: ASX’s long-term suspension rules give Dome a one-year deadline from the missed report due date and a two-year window to get trading resumed before it risks being removed from the official list entirely.

Here’s what reinstatement actually takes. Under Listing Rule seventeen point eight, once Dome lodges the outstanding annual report and pays any fees, ASX will normally reinstate before the next trading day opens. The catch is the note attached to that rule — ASX can refuse if there’s another reason to suspend, and Dome’s nil cash and going-concern flag are exactly that kind of reason. Bougainville Copper just went through this: lodged late, then had to show ASX it had rebuilt its reporting systems before reinstatement was granted. On the clock, Dome’s annual report was due September thirtieth, twenty twenty-six. The one-year lodgement deadline is September thirtieth, twenty twenty-seven. The two-year suspension deadline is October first, twenty twenty-eight. Whichever hits first triggers removal from the official list. ASX can also delist earlier under Rule seventeen point twelve if it decides Dome no longer has adequate financial condition — and with zero cash at June thirtieth, that argument is already live. Now the Fiji side. The EIA public review closed yesterday, October thirtieth. Public meetings are November sixth and seventh in Sigatoka. After that, Fiji’s Department of Environment analyses everything and decides next steps — but there’s no published statutory timeline for that analysis phase. The feasibility study was expected later this year, and a mining lease application follows feasibility. No mining lease exists yet, only the prospecting licence, and Fiji’s lands minister has publicly stressed that submitting an EIA is not approval. So the sequencing problem is stark. Dome’s audit needs a valuation of Sigatoka, the valuation needs permitting momentum, and the permitting momentum is stuck in an open-ended Fijian review while Dome’s cash is essentially gone and it’s drip-feeding twelve percent convertible notes. If the DOE drags into mid-twenty twenty-seven, Dome is staring down the one-year lodgement deadline with an unfinished audit. The one escape hatch is that ASX may grant a short extension if Dome can show it’s in the final stages of a signed, financed transaction that restores trading — but final stages is a high bar when your main asset’s approval is still in public consultation. One angle worth a closer look: Dome’s June twenty twenty-five accounts already carried a material going-concern uncertainty with about half a million in cash. The convertible notes are building an interest and conversion overhang on a twenty-one million dollar company.

The Pensioners would like to know who exactly in the Rabuka government is supporting Dome/Magna, who is prepared to sacrifice our Nations National Parks to get their Thirty Pieces of Silver